IPO – An Acronym for “Initial Public Offering” or an “Inevitably Painful Outcome?”
As you contemplate a sale versus an IPO, it is extremely important to consider the pros and cons of each approach. We share some of them with you here.
Supply vs. demand “IPO” forces
Having co-piloted the journey with 100+ entrepreneurs and founders and having met with several hundred more over the past decade and a half, I can tell you that taking a company public is rarely a goal in and of itself. I often say that we have more than a dozen founders who have become C-level executives, but maybe only one or two who actually wanted to do so. It is sometimes simply the only path forward on the heels of elevated valuation rounds, as investors need some mechanism to help achieve liquidity.
The lens of the marketplace
Let’s work backward a bit. First, as the press so often notes these days, companies are staying private a lot longer than they used to. This dynamic has created an entire marketplace for buying and selling private company shares. As a result, by the time a lot of companies go public these days, the “pop” of the return has already been enjoyed by the early, private-market investors.
Historically, this would have been reserved for “angel” investors and venture capitalists, but several platforms have democratized this asset, empowering individual investors to easily buy and sell shares while companies are still private. In fact, a few large brokerage firms recently purchased these types of platforms to help vertically integrate this type of equity investment offering into their roster of investment options.
I’d argue that private companies still trade more “by appointment” than their public market cousins, but it is a radically different dynamic from even 5 or 10 years ago. So, what are your options?
Door #1—the IPO (the painful parts)
A few things are super critical to think about as your company achieves valuation escape velocity and barrels toward an IPO to help avoid an Inevitably Painful Outcome:
- First, an IPO is not truly a liquidity event for a founder.
- Second, in the few instances where the IPO does become a liquidity event for a founder, it is wise to remember that the liquidity drips out very slowly over many, many years (so things like Section 16, Rule 144 and 10b51 may become your most common phrases and numbers).
- Third, everyone knows how wealthy you are (at least on paper). Friends. Family. Parents of your kids’ friends. Your employees. People you’re dating.
- Your S1 discloses how many shares you sold pre-IPO and how many shares you may have after the IPO. And anyone can look up the share price and your back-of-the-envelope net worth.
- Fourth, you are required to report to public markets every quarter, which is radically different than private funding rounds.
- aIf you are the CEO, you may spend as many as 6-8 full days of each quarter (90 days) prepping for quarterly calls and talking with investors.
- Fifth, perhaps the important thing to remember is that you may become subject to the whims and woes of the public markets, which may be vastly different than your company’s value. So, idiosyncratic dynamics may no longer matter, and “short-termism” may begin to tip the scale.
The lens of Corient
As usual, while it is unlikely I’m offering you a massive light-bulb-sized epiphany, perhaps you haven’t seen it laid out like this in black and white before.
And, while I’m not saying there are no amazing benefits to going public, I am saying that as fiduciaries for our founders, at Corient our lens of advice and mindset are solely focused on you and your family and your life. Not the shareholders. Not the board members. Not the LPs of the funds that invested in those private rounds. You.
We believe that “money in the bank is worth 10x more than the money on your cap table.” As a result, our advice is often to take out secondary money every time you can—as much as you can. If you do so and still end up with an IPO as the only path forward, you’ll be way less reliant on selling shares once you go public (and also less reliant on ChatGPT explaining the ins and outs of Section 16, Rule 144 and 10b51s).
That pre-IPO liquidity is extremely important from a lifestyle perspective and as an external signal, as actions may speak louder than words. Consider that the more shares a C-level executive holds onto, the better the optics regarding the conviction of the company. On the flip side, a C-level executive dumping shares quickly may have unintended negative consequences for share prices and shareholders alike.
What’s behind door #2? M&A
Contrasting with door #1, doing an M&A deal before you reach the “point of no return” is indeed a liquidity event for a founder, although it is worth noting that you may likely need to roll some equity into the acquirers’ company for a period of time. (You should try to optimize for a tax-free reorganization, which could maintain the shares’ Qualified Small Business Status.) Additionally, you may have some time-based milestones as well as performance-based hurdles to receive your full monetization. The buyer may re-vest some of your equity and convert it into more of an “earn out.” We recommend working with an experienced team of attorneys at the deal and personal levels to understand the taxation of these additional payouts.
All these permutations may come into play in any M&A deal, but it is usually still a real liquidity event with cash in the bank and no tax code memorization required around Section 16, Rule 144 and 10b51s.
M&As are also far less public. Sure, there may be a reported headline number for the deal, but, for better or worse, no one really knows what you personally made. Plus, you typically gain way more optionality with your life over the next 2-5 years.
Conclusion
As you contemplate a sale versus an IPO, it is extremely important to consider the buyer. A strategic partner may have very different needs for your talents and team than a private equity sponsor. And there are pros and cons to each. Make a list. Have two columns. And I suggest adding a qualifier to the pros and cons, which is “short term” and “long term.” I believe that making the traditional pro/con list three-dimensional in this way can really help bring things into focus.
At Corient, we have succesfully guided dozens and dozens of founders through the “getting ready for a transaction” and “life after the deal” phases of the entrepreneurial journey. We can provide a sneak peek at what life may look like when taking either path.
Of course, we realize that the path and outcome for an “exit” is not squarely in your control. Our hope is that by bringing some of these ideas and potentially less obvious dynamics to the forefront of your vision, if you do pursue an IPO, it is with intentionality and not simply letting inertia win. Our goal is to change the “P” from “Painful” to “Positive.” That’s an amazing Outcome for all in an IPO.
Speak to a Corient Wealth Advisor to discover how the Corient Entrepreneurs & Founders Group can help you at every step along your wealth journey.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Adam Katz
Adam is a Partner and Head of the Founder and Entrepreneur Group—a national team across Corient. Adam has more than 25 years of experience in ultra-high net worth wealth management and working with founders and entrepreneurs. Having founded and sold his own company, Adam is not simply a provider and wealth advisor, but is also a peer who truly understands all the variables, questions and potential roadblocks on both sides of a deal. Adam has served as co-pilot to dozens of founders and entrepreneurs, helping them to think on multiple levels, while navigating through the full business lifecycle—from setting up and growing to preparing for and executing the sale—through life after the deal and even into new endeavors. He, his wife, and their two children live in Westfield, New Jersey. Adam holds an master’s degree from the NYU Stern School of Business and a bachelor’s degree from Brandeis University.
CONTENT DISCLOSURE
This information is for educational purposes and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal, tax, insurance, or investment advice. This does not constitute an offer to provide any services, nor a solicitation to purchase securities. The contents are not intended to be advice tailored to any particular person or situation. We believe the information provided is accurate and reliable, but do not warrant it as to completeness or accuracy. This information may include opinions or forecasts, including investment strategies and economic and market conditions; however, there is no guarantee that such opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct, and they also may change without notice. We encourage you to speak with a qualified professional regarding your scenario and the then-current applicable laws and rules.
Different types of investments involve degrees of risk, including the loss of principal. The future performance of any investment or wealth management strategy, including those recommended by us, may not be profitable or suitable or prove successful. Past performance is not indicative of future results. One cannot invest directly in an index or benchmark, and those do not reflect the deduction of various fees that would diminish results. Any index or benchmark performance figures are for comparison purposes only, and client account holdings will not directly correspond to any such data.
Advisory services are offered through Corient Private Wealth LLC, a registered investment adviser (“RIA”) regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The advisory services are only offered in jurisdictions where the RIA is appropriately registered. The use of the term “registered” does not imply any particular level of skill or training and does not imply any approval by the SEC. For a complete discussion of the scope of advisory services offered, fees, and other disclosures, please review the RIA’s Disclosure Brochure (Form ADV Part 2A) and Form CRS, available upon request from the RIA and online at https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/. We also encourage you to review the RIA’s Privacy Policy and Code of Ethics, which are available upon request.
Our clients must, in writing, advise us of personal, financial, or investment objective changes and any restrictions desired on our services so that we may re-evaluate any previous recommendations and adjust our advisory services as needed. For current clients, please advise us immediately if you are not receiving monthly account statements from your custodian. We encourage you to compare your custodial statements to any information we provide to you.
5001877 – November 2025